Showing posts with label photos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label photos. Show all posts

Wednesday, 25 July 2012

Shock discovery: 248 human embryos found trashed in Russian forest (GRAPHIC PHOTOS)

RT.com
July 24, 2012

A fishing trip in Russia’s Urals ended with cries of horror as a man found canisters filled with human embryos, some already shaped to baby bodies.

­Lids on the bright blue containers apparently unlocked as the canisters hit the ground, and many embryos spilled out. The little bodies, no longer than 15 centimeters, shrank, turning into mummies.

“A friend of mine called at night and said he went finishing and wanted to get some wood for his fire. He found some abandoned water canisters and wanted to take them for his house. And when he came up, he saw… little baby bodies,” a local told Russia’s Channel 4.

Arriving Monday morning, police found 248 embryos aged 12-16 weeks in and around the four canisters. Labels attached to tiny hands and legs listed family names of assumed mothers and some digit codes, which may refer to the pregnancy period, date of abortion or the hospital where the body originated from.

The 50-liter canisters filled with formalin seem to have been thrown out of a vehicle not far from a road leading to Nevyansk, a town on the slopes of the Ural Mountains.

Nevyansk authorities immediately said the canisters could not have originated in their town.

“Our area is too small; we can’t have so many stillborns, miscarriages or artificial abortions,” they said.

Later it was revealed that the horrifying content was “biological waste” from at least three hospitals in Ekaterinburg, the region’s major city.

“It appears a waste disposal company has failed to carry out its duties properly,” remark local authorities as the investigation continues. The Ministry of Health has been requested to determine which companies provide embryo disposal services to Ekaterinburg hospitals.

In Russia, embryos are subject to immediate disposal as they are classified high hazard waste. Prior to disposal, they are to be kept in special packages, not in canisters with formalin. It is also out of practice to attach labels with any information, at least in Ekaterinburg hospitals.

But the bodies found near the Urals not only fall out of this description – the labels show they may have been stored for over ten years.

Some medical experts believe the embryos might have been meant for studies or other purposes, as they contain stem cells. The cells are widely used for immune illnesses treatment and in cosmetic procedures.

Prosecutors are talking tentatively of criminal charges, but most probably the guilty party will bear an administrative punishment.

Warning! Graphic images.

The embryos were found in and around four water containers (Still from NTV coverage video)


Police spent whole Monday studying the scene not far from the town of Nevyansk (Still from NTV coverage video)


Many embryos were full shaped baby bodies (Still from NTV coverage video)


Some embryos might have been stored for ten years (Still from NTV coverage video)

Tags:




View the original article here

Sunday, 24 June 2012

NSA social spy network Facebook to track individuals across photos, videos with facial recognition

J. D. Heyes
Natural News
June 24, 2012

Have you ever been “tagged” by someone – a friend, a co-worker, or perhaps someone you don’t really know that well but who may be a friend of a friend – on Facebook? You may want to rethink that whole concept, thanks to a little purchase the social media giant made recently.

Facebook has purchased Face.com’s facial recognition technology, which techies say will make it faster and easier to tag photos, but which privacy experts say could become an issue, according to a report in InformationWeek.

The social media company, whose stock price has steadily fallen since its initial public offering in mid-May, paid between $55-60 million for the Israeli-developed mobile recognition technology, Techcrunch.com, adding that it “could potentially allow you to upload a photo to Facebook while on the go, instantly receive suggestions of whom to tag, and confirm the tags with one click.”

“This is important to Facebook because right now there’s probably a ton of untagged mobile photos getting posted. Those are lost opportunities for engagement because when you get notified that you’ve been tagged in a photo, you probably visit Facebook immediately to check it. These tags also help Facebook understand who a photo is relevant to, so it can feature it in the news feeds of your closest friends,” Techcrunch.com reported.

There is something sinister here

In addition to the new programming, Facebook launched a new app – Facebook Camera – in late May, which is described as “a standalone photos app where you can shoot, filter, and share single or sets of photos and scroll through a feed of photos uploaded to Facebook by your friends.”

What makes Facebook’s purchase of facial recognition tools even more ominous is the company’s earlier $1 billion purchase of Instagram, which, Techcrunch.com notes, can be tied to Face.com’s program.

How good is this technology? Think three letters: “C-I-A.”

Face.com’s technology allows users to recognize faces even when conditions are poor, such as low lighting. So now Facebook has a) a super-advanced facial recognition program; b) a brand-new camera app; and c) the ability to post photos instantly.

All because the company believes the “next big thing” in social media is being able to post pictures in real-time so that your friends can quickly latch onto them?

Maybe, but this is pretty high-tech stuff for a social media site and, given Facebook’s (and Google’s, and other sites’) penchant for ripping off your personal information and invading your privacy, there is plenty here for concern.

No doubt the additions will make it easier for Facebook users to identify friends in photos and video – especially those on mobile devices – and that businesses could benefit by being able to better track “when and where their products are being talked about and promoted, especially with the rise of social sharing sites like Pinterest,” InformationWeek reported.

But at what cost to privacy? And how much easier will these technology additions make it for government snoops to “tag” and track you?

To tag or not to tag?

“Facebook’s page on photo tagging provides advice to users on how to limit or eliminate visibility of photos they are tagged in, as well as on how to remove tags, but the process can quickly become complicated and hard to keep up with,” says the IW report. “Businesses must take care to ensure that increased use of tagging does not result in increased privacy concerns for customers.”

There is legitimate concern this technology will most likely be used to deepen network databases already developed to conduct passive domestic surveillance on Americans by documenting relationships between people.

Imagine being “tagged” in a photo of someone who, without your knowledge, is involved in criminal activity. Since you are tied to that person, will that be justification for authorities to pry through your personal life, which they will justify by saying they were only trying to conduct a “thorough investigation?”

Think before you tag (or allow yourself to be tagged).

Sources:

http://www.informationweek.com

http://techcrunch.com

http://www.informationweek.com

Tags: , , ,




View the original article here